Welcome, Friend!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

advertisement
advertisement
Veritas-Health LLC has recently released patient forums to our Arthritis-Health web site.

Please visit http://www.arthritis-health.com/forum

There are several patient story videos on Spine-Health that talk about Arthritis. Search on Patient stories
Protect anonymity
We strongly suggest that members do not include their email addresses. Once that is published , your email address is available to anyone on the internet , including hackers.

Notice
All discussions and comments that contain an external URL will be automatically moved to the spam queue. No external URL pointing to a medical web site is permitted. Forum rules also indicate that you need prior moderator approval. If you are going to post an external URL, contact one of the moderators to get their approval.
Attention New Members
Your initial discussion or comment automatically is sent to a moderator's approval queue before it can be published.
There are no medical professionals on this forum side of the site. Therefore, no one is capable or permitted to provide any type of medical advice.
This includes any analysis, interpretation, or advice based on any diagnostic test

Standing MRI VS. Conventional MRI

Has anyone had any success finding the cause of pain and numbness using the newer MRI machines vs. the conventional laydown style?

My back pain and leg numbness don't bother me very much unless I'm standing/walking so I'm wondering if my spine is doing something while standing that is not shown on conventional MRIs while laying on my back.


Anyone have any thoughts?

Thanks
advertisement

Comments

  • dilaurodilauro ConnecticutPosts: 10,059
    machine currently provides a more detailed and higher resolution for the MRI images. The newer standing units were inferior several years ago, but they are slowly catching up.

    The primary purpose for the two different devices was comfort. Many people could not go into the conventional MRI tube.

    As far as what you have indicated, there should not be any difference using the conventional MRI because you hurt more while standing.

    They have been some posts by members that indicated that their problems did not show up on the conventional MRI, but only on the standing. I have nothing to base this on.

    I would ask your doctor which unit they prefer. They will be the ones who are going to diagnose your problem.
    Ron DiLauro Veritas-Health Forums Manager
    I am not a medical professional. I comment on personal experiences
    You can email me at: rdilauro@veritashealth.com
  • Thanks for the responses. I have an appointment with my third back specialist soon. My original Dr. (who performed 3 surgeries on my L5-S1) moved out of state so I was forced to find a new specialist. The second one I was not comfortable with and felt like he was not experienced enough. So onto #3.

    I was originally diagnosed with DDD and Stenosis along with a herniated disc back in 2012. Recently my pain has come back and my leg and foot numbness are worse then they have ever been. I had new scans done (mylogram and MRI) and found out I have a herniated disc at t12-L1 or L1-L2 (depending on how you count, Long story) The MRI results state that the herniation does not appear to be pressing on the nerve. This makes me wonder if when standing its putting pressure on the nerve that the conventional MRI wont show.
Sign In or Register to comment.