Interspinous Process Spacers

As seen in because it reduces the space available for the nerve roots in the exiting foraminal openings.

The interspinous devices may be implanted with the patient under a mild sedative and local anesthesia as a day surgery procedure (patient goes home the same day) or under light anesthesia. This may be particularly beneficial for elderly patients for whom more extensive open surgery may present too great of a surgical risk due to less favorable general health and fitness level.

There are several types of interspinous devices. Many of the devices profiled below are still in relatively early stages of development and testing, so data about indications for use, effectiveness, and potential risks and complications are often preliminary and further testing is needed before conclusions may be drawn.

The X-STOP for lumbar spinal stenosis

The X-STOP Interspinous Process Decompression Device (), made by Kyphon, Inc., in Sunnyvale, California, is made of two titanium pieces. The first is implanted beside and under the spinous process. The second piece is plate-like and is placed on the opposite side of the spinous process and is then attached to the first.

The X-stop device recently received FDA approval for use in patients with spinal stenosis in the US. In the study evaluating the device, the primary indications were age of at least 50 years, lower extremity pain (with or without back pain) secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis that was relieved with flexion (forward bending), and able to walk at least 50 feet. Patients were not enrolled in the study if they had a fixed motor deficit or more than mild grade spondylolisthesis.

Results of the multi-center trial conducted in the US indicated that among patients with pain arising from neurogenic claudication (a symptom of spinal stenosis), the X-STOP provided significantly greater pain relief than epidural steroid injections (the treatment used as a comparative control).³

The Wallis for mild to moderate degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis

The Wallis interspinous device, made by Abbott Spine in Austin, Texas, was developed in 1986. The device’s original design used a titanium block inserted between adjacent processes held in place with a flat Dacron cord or ribbon. A clinical trial, conducted outside the United States, was initiated in 1988, involving 300 patients who were all treated for recurrent disc herniation.¹ Patients whose surgery incorporated the Wallis device with a second discectomy had significantly better results than those who did not receive the device.

The primary change in the second generation of the Wallis implant () was changing the material of the interspinous block to PEEK, polyetheretherketone, a strong plastic-like polymer that has more elasticity and is therefore less rigid that the previously used titanium. Results from a European study including twelve-month follow-up for 137 patients undergoing implantation of the new generation of the device were presented at a 2005 spine conference.2 Patients had significant reduction in pain severity.

The current generation of the Wallis device is being evaluated in a multi-center FDA-regulated clinical trial in the US. It is hypothesized that the Wallis device might be a treatment option for low back pain associated with degenerative disc disease as well as lateral recess and central spinal stenosis. A clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the Wallis device for treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease has recently been started. This trial for degenerative disc disease will compare the Wallis to a total disc replacement. A second clinical trial of the Wallis to treat spinal stenosis trial is being contemplated.

The DIAM for spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease

The DIAM Spinal Stabilization System, a non-rigid interspinous spacer, is made by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee. A US FDA-regulated clinical trial for the DIAM for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis was initiated in late 2006. Also in 2006, the FDA granted an IDE to Medtronic to study the DIAM in patients with low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease.

The DIAM () is an “H” shaped polyester-covered, silicone bumper that is placed between the spinous processes with a mesh band and suture to hold it in place. The device has been used in Europe for a few years. A group from Italy recently reported at a conference that in a series of 912 patients, there was a significant reduction in pain and a high rate of patient satisfaction.⁴ In their series, there was a 3.8% complication rate including infections, fractures in the spinous processes, and removal of the device combined with fusion.

The Coflex for lumbar spinal stenosis

This interspinous device, made by Paradigm Spine, New York, has been used in Europe. In October 2006, US FDA-regulated clinical trials for the Coflex were initiated, comparing the Coflex with pedicle screw fusion for patients with spinal stenosis. The Coflex device was originally developed as the “interspinous U”.

The Coflex™ () is based upon the Interspinous U designed in France in 1994. While the height of the device distracts the foraminal opening, the “U” shape is designed to allow controlled movement in forward and backward bending. It has also been used in Europe and favorable results, based on pain and patient satisfaction, were reported at a 2005 spine conference.^5,6

REFERENCES:

1. Sénégas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: The Wallis system. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(Suppl 2):S164–9.

2. Boeree N. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar motion segment with the Wallis system. Spinal Arthroplasty Society. May, 2005; New York, New York.

3. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine. 2005;30:1351-8.

4. Guizzardi G, Petrini P, Fabrizi AP, et al. The use of DIAM (interspinous stress-breaker device) in the DDD: Italian multicenter clinical experience. Spinal Arthroplasty Society. May, 2005; New York, New York.

5. Eif M, Schenke H. The Interspinous-U: Indications, experience, and results. Spinal Arthroplasty Society. May, 2005; New York, New York.

6. Cho K-S. Clinical outcome of the Interspinous-U (posterior distraction device) in the elderly lumbar spine. Spinal Arthroplasty Society. May, 2005; New York, New York.