Welcome, Friend!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

advertisement

Quick Start Forum Video Tutorial

    Forum-Tutorial-Screenshot
Protect anonymity
We strongly suggest that members do not include their email addresses. Once that is published , your email address is available to anyone on the internet , including hackers.

Notice
All discussions and comments that contain an external URL will be automatically moved to the spam queue. No external URL pointing to a medical web site is permitted. Forum rules also indicate that you need prior moderator approval. If you are going to post an external URL, contact one of the moderators to get their approval.
There are no medical professionals on this forum side of the site. Therefore, no one is capable or permitted to provide any type of medical advice.
This includes any analysis, interpretation, or advice based on any diagnostic test

The main site has all the formal medical articles and videos for you to research on.
advertisement

coflex procedure in California

Know anyone with considerable experience with this procedure?????

It is a viable alternative for spinal stenosis with much less surgery or complications
advertisement

Comments

  • Paulo, looked at the coflex procedure. It's interesting information.

    (Note for others; Coflex is an interspinous process device designed to open the foramen whilst retaining vertebrae motion without fusion. See http://www.spine-health.com/treatment/spinal-fusion/interspinous-process-spacers )

    I note that the FDA granted PMA (pre market approval) approval recently in Oct 2012. http://www.spine-health.com/forum/treatment/back-surgery-and-neck-surgery/press-release-coflex-fda-approved-october

    Interesting that these types of devices were not discussed with me by my surgeon.

    Using the search function with Coflex as the keyword, you will get some previous posts.
  • I spoke to dr. And did a lot of research including FDA approval. It is called interlaminar. It's not x-stop which has failed. It goes in deeper even though it is the same minimally invasive so it is not on spinous processes which are not very secure. If your stenosis is exactly what was FDA studied the results are very good.
  • advertisement
Sign In or Register to comment.