Welcome, Friend!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Quick Start Forum Video Tutorial

Protect anonymity
We strongly suggest that members do not include their email addresses. Once that is published , your email address is available to anyone on the internet , including hackers.

All discussions and comments that contain an external URL will be automatically moved to the spam queue. No external URL pointing to a medical web site is permitted. Forum rules also indicate that you need prior moderator approval. If you are going to post an external URL, contact one of the moderators to get their approval.
There are no medical professionals on this forum side of the site. Therefore, no one is capable or permitted to provide any type of medical advice.
This includes any analysis, interpretation, or advice based on any diagnostic test

The main site has all the formal medical articles and videos for you to research on.

New solutions in Neck/Back issues?

SukhreSSukhre San Diego, CAPosts: 205
edited 09/03/2015 - 3:27 PM in Back Surgery and Neck Surgery
There seem to be two main solutions for serious neck & back issues
1) fusion. They fuse, use bone etc to connect & plates, screws so that until fusion happens fusing bones are in place.
+ stability + less future damage to nerves - loss of mobility increase the chance of adjacent segment problem - intrumentations & other causing swallowing issues
2) ADR: the Arificial Discs are put in a way that no other significant intruments are needed.
+mobily + stability + prevent future nerve damage - more metals may cause complexities - sometimes bone growth cause them to be fused.

Fusion has been around probably 40+ years. ADR probably 20+ (may be more). Why not thinking about new solutions to use less metal but still keep mobiliy.

1) Core of the ADR need to be made of metal if the whole disc is made of bone type of material they may fuse. How about making most of the ADR with bone type of material except where two parts needs to slide on each other?
2) If cloning can make an exact copy of another animal, why cannot it clone just a disc and use the clone disc to replace the worn disc
3) Any other material that might keep on level collapsing into other but still keep them rotating?

I guess I am day dreaming!

MRI shows C4-C7 severe steonosis. Pain in hand.
Sign In or Register to comment.